Friday, May 14, 2010
So who do I cheer for now?
The Cavs are no longer in the playoffs, as you may have heard, but I still have a playoff beard, so I have to cheer for somebody. So the question is, which of the four remaining teams do I cheer for? Here's a quick countdown from "If they win, I'm slitting my wrists" to "I might have even cheered for them against the Cavs".
4 (But it might as well be 4,000,000,000,000 since I would never, EVER cheer for them). Orlando Magic I hate Orlando and its family-friendly theme parks; I hate Stan Van Gundy and his weasel-voice; I hate Dwight Howard and his smiles and his whining and his body-type (his shoulders are a little too square for my tastes); I hate Vince Carter and his pussiness and his railroading of Toronto and his lack of balls and his inability to be what we all thought he would be after the 2000 dunk contest; I hate Rashard Lewis and his contract that will pay him 19, 21, and 22 million dollars; I actually don't mind Jameer Nelson, but he gets my scorn due to proxy.
3. Los Angeles Lakers Cheering for Kobe Bryant is like cheering for Alex Rodriguez: kind of lame. Ron Artest has disappointed thus far this postseason by not completely losing his mind (there's still time, so fingers crossed!), and Pau Gasol has gone from being underrated to being vastly overrated (I have heard him described more than once as a future Hall-of-Famer, which is so ridiculous I can't even come up with a good analogy here). Derek Fisher is terrible for 98 percent of a game, series, season, but annoyingly always hits a three that swings the most important game of the year. Nobody likes guys like that. Mostly, though, I am just bored with the Lakers. Haven't we seen them enough already?
2. Boston Celtics This may be surprising, considering what has just transpired, but I don't blame them. The Celts played great, hard, clean basketball and beat a team that didn't really care or got scared or choked or just wasn't as good as we thought or any combination of the previous. I don't blame the Celtics for what happened, and actually respect them for playing their asses off. If they won the title, it would be a pretty amazing testament to how much chemistry and heart matter in basketball.
1. Phoenix Suns As a mentioned in the intro, I almost would have cheered for them over the Cavs if the two teams were to have met Finals (which they obviously won't). They are the anti-Magic. Steve Nash is one of the five most likable guys in the NBA (along with Dirk, Big Z, Kevin Durant, and Joakim Noah*), and this picture is too awesome to deny. Grant Hill is perhaps the classiest player of his generation, and has inexplicably re-invented himself as a defensive stopper. Amare Stoudamire has done the unthinkable and curbed his offensive aggression as needed in his contract year, while Jason Richardson is playing every playoff series like he's back in Oakland and the 2007 Mavericks were coming to town every night. When you add in a bench that includes Jared Dudley, Leandro Barabosa, and Channing Frye (who shoots 3s like Wes Person now) and the return of goofball and defensive anchor Robin Lopez, you have a team that anyone not from Boston, LA, or Orlando can (and should) love. The power of the playoff beard has been passed onto you, Phoenix. I hope you enjoy the inevitable back-breaking, franchise-wrecking series loss you are about to endure.
*Of course I'm joking. I actually am having hard time pinning down a fifth likable guy. Leave your suggestions in the comments, if you want.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
What is wrong with LeBron James?
1. His arm is barely hanging on. If the name "Tommy John" is uttered in connection with LeBron this off-season, then we can all admire how amazing it was he was playing at all.
2. He was due for a rough stretch. According to LeBron following last night's game, "(He) spoil(s) a lot of people with my play. When you have 3 bad games in a 7-year career, it is easy to point that out." The odds alone say he was due for at least one stinker after having only THREE in SEVEN YEARS!!! It's just unfortunate that it came during the biggest game of the season. While we're quoting LeBron's post-game comments, can we all agree that his demeanor is bizarre, if not offensive? Why is he so nonchalant, why isn't he pissed (did you hear Kevin Garnett? He is already fired up for Game 6, calling it the Celtics' Game 7, and still calling the Cavs the best team in the NBA when they clearly aren't. That's called RESPECT FOR YOUR OPPONENT, LEBRON!!!), and why is he such an ass about "spoiling people?" Maybe...
3. He's on mescaline. "Did you say mescaline?" "Indeed I did."
4. He's trying to get Mike Brown fired. I've always liked Mike Brown, and have always thought he gets a bad rap, but if LeBron wants him gone, that means he wants to stay--albeit with a new coach--and if the choice is Mike Brown or six more years of LeBron, then don't let the door hit you in the ass, Mikey. In all seriousness, this theory actually might have something to it, considering John Calipari and the agent he shares with LeBron were sitting courtside just days after rumors circulated that Calipari is LeBron's dream coach. I hope it's this one, because the alternative is...
5. He can't wait to get out of Cleveland. This is the most likely scenario, and the most fitting for a sports town that is getting almost too depressing to care about anymore.
All this said, though, I still think the Cavs win in 7*.
*And then get swept by the Magic.
Sunday, May 02, 2010
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Well, at least this is finally exorcised. *
*Or not. Fuck that guy. And poor Craig Ehlo. I'm still convinced Jordan kicked him in the face when they show MJ's celebration from the angle they always show it from.
Finally, the Cavs beat the Bulls in the playoffs. That's one monkey off their backs; up next, the Boston Celtics, who the Cavs have actually beaten in the playoffs (essentially ending Larry Bird's career with a 122-104 blowout of the C's in Game 7 of the 1992 Eastern Conference semis). Before we get to that scintillating showdown, however, I just wanted to reflect on some miscellaneous thoughts about the series that just was:
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Oklahoma City 110 Los Angeles Lakers 89
Thank you, OKC, for reminding me how rough things could be for my beloved Cavaliers. Sure, they lost to the Bulls by 2 on the road, but the Lakers got smoked. That score doesn't really indicate how bad this game was.
The starters for both teams were pulled for the fourth quarter, which is insane to see in a playoff game. I'm sure it's happened in 1 vs. 8 blowouts before, but I seriously doubt it was the 8-seed blowing out the 1-seed in any of those other games.
Kobe Bryant, who was actually in the conversation for best player in the league at some point in his overrated career, put up a whopping 12 points and didn't play a minute in the fourth. How does a "killer" like "Black Mamba" (which he totally ripped off from Kill Bill 2 and never credited, which is fucking low, Kobe) let this happen? Isn't he the most competitive player in the league?
Of course, it's not like he had much help. Pau Gasol and Andrew Bynum led the Lakers with 13, but Gasol was terrible, grabbing only 4 rebounds. The Lakers as a whole gave a pathetic effort in the rebound department (not to mention every other department of the game), as evidenced most egregiously by a series in the 3rd quarter where Russell Westbrook took and missed a poorly conceived pull-up jumper, chased down his own rebound ALL THE WAY ON THE BASELINE, AFTER IT HIT THE FLOOR (!!!), and passed to Nenad Krstic (who converted a 3-point play).
I know I lambasted the Cavs for their performance in Game 3 on Thursday night, but at least they had enough heart to fight back from a 21-point deficit in the 3rd and put themselves in position to win the game. The Lakers just rolled over, and I can only hope that the Thunder win Game 5 in LA and really put the pressure on. We'll see how much "heart of a champion" is left in Kobe and the gang, or if they're the soft cowards they looked like in OKC on Saturday night.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
NBA Playoffs Update: Round One Quick Thoughts
As each playoff series shifts venues, I thought it would be a good time to look back on what transpired in the first two games and to look forward to what to expect in the lower seeds' home arenas. For those of you wondering when I'm going to get back to my Season In Review series, I can only say in good time. With the playoffs starting and the NFL draft going down, I felt there were more pressing issues at hand. Also, I'm growing a playoff beard for the Cavs, but it's not quite ready to be revealed to the world. Maybe it will be after they finish off the Bulls, so look forward to that!
Saturday, April 17, 2010
NBA Playoff Preview: Western Conference
While the Eastern Conference is looking like it's going to be chalk throughout each of the first round matchups, the West projects to be a bit more interesting. With each team winning at least 50 games during the regular season, this year's field ranks as one of the deepest in league history, and should provide tight, prolonged series across the board.
Friday, April 16, 2010
NBA Playoff Preview: Eastern Conference
With the playoff matchups finally set, I figured I would take a break from my Season in Review series and give a quick rundown on what to expect in the first round. Today, the Eastern Conference.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
NCAA Explosion!!!!!
With the 2007-08 College Football Bowl Season a little more than a week away, it is time once again to pound your head against the wall while you watch 2-3 weeks of meaningless football before getting to the only game that matters, a wait that is only worsened by the fact that you spent nearly two weeks watching no football at all (since there wasn’t any on). We all know the system currently in place is fucked, and numerous people have presented alternatives (the best being the Crystal Bowl, which this is loosely based on and is unfortunately no longer online). The problem with these alternatives is that they don’t do enough for me. Sure, a playoff would be sweet, but there would still be problems. Therefore, I present the follow completely-unrealistic-yet-totally-sane solution to the BCS Problem. Yes, there is a playoff, but before that can happen, this must happen...
A COMPLETE CONFERENCE OVERHAUL
The key to any system reboot of college football must begin with making sure every conference has a championship game. In order for this to become a reality, however, the composition of many of the conferences must be shaken up. While this may upset some hardcore purists, let me just say that by creating conferences that can all support a championship game the integrity and importance of the conference regular seasons will be maintained and perhaps even strengthened. To begin with, the SEC and Big 12 must remain the same, serving as shining examples of how things are supposed to be done. The rest of the conferences will shake out like this (with new members in italics):
ACC
Atlantic
Clemson
Coastal
Virginia Tech
Georgia Tech
Duke
The ACC was actually alright the way it was, but
BIG EAST
East
Navy
West
See, doesn’t that feel better? While
BIG TEN
North
Purdue
Notre Dame
South
Northwestern
This is the conference that gave me the most trouble. Although I only added one team, it is the biggie that everyone knows should be in the Big Ten, but never will be. Beyond the sweet deal Notre Dame has with NBC, they also have rivalries with teams all over the country, and joining the Big Ten would put an end to most of them (at least on their current yearly basis). The bigger concern, however, is whether or not to put
CONFERENCE
East
UCF
Southern Miss
Tulane
UAB
West
TCU
Rice
UTEP
SMU
Only a minor shakeup will be required here, with TCU returning to the C-USA to take the place of the departed Marshall and Tulane moving to the East Division for geography and balance’s sake.
MAC
East
Army
West
Middle
Army comes in to replace
PAC 10
North
Stanford
South
USC
UCLA
I really like how this conference shakes out. Boise State can definitely hang with the Oregons and Washingtons, while Fresno State can always get hot again like they were a few years ago. Both schools seem to fit in both style and geography.
SUN BELT
East
West
Louisiana-Monroe
Louisiana-Lafayette
Being at the bottom of the conference barrel, the Sun Belt is the only conference with fewer than 12 teams and unbalanced divisions. Perhaps some other D-II or whatever the hell it’s called now teams will step into the conference as
MOUNTAIN WEST ATHLETIC CONFERENCE (MWAC)
Coastal
UNLV
Mountain
BYU
Air Force
The former Mountain West and WAC re-combine forces to form the largest conference in the country. While the re-shuffling deprives the conference of mid-major powers TCU,
CONFERENCE CHAMPIONS GET AUTOMATIC PLAYOFF BIDS…
…while there will also be six at-large bids determined by BCS rank. See what I meant about the conference schedule still mattering? Getting into the conference championship is akin to getting into the first round of the playoffs, since most teams will have to win their conference to assure a spot among the sixteen team national playoff field. Let’s just go through what this year’s conference title games would look like and see how much each match-up would mean to each team (the number indicates BCS rank, while CAPS signals my projected [or the actual] winner).
ACC: 15 Clemson vs. 3
Virginia Tech would probably still have a shot at an at-large berth following a loss, while Clemson would absolutely have to win.
BIG 12: 6
We’ve already seen how this plays out, with both teams still securing playoff berths.
BIG EAST: 14
Both teams would be playing for their playoff lives due to the relative weakness of the Big East.
BIG TEN:
CONFERENCE
MAC:
SUN BELT:
Obviously all three of these games would be do-or-die.
PAC 10:
This game would be a must win for both teams since USC would have three losses after a defeat here.
SEC: 16
This could possibly be a must win for either team, as well, as LSU would suffer their third “L” with a loss.
MWAC: 10
Here’s yet another win-or-go-to-the-Hawaii-Bowl game, with
After the 10 conference champions have been crowned, the BCS Rankings will then be used to determine…
SIX AT-LARGE TEAMS…
…who will be:
5
6
8
11
12
And, for all the people who say debate is good for the game, I present your sixth and final at-large team…
13
Following a national bye week (which would have been last weekend), these teams will then play a
FIRST ROUND
held at the higher seeds’ home stadium (with the exception that an at-large team cannot host a conference champion, as seen in this season’s Kansas-West Virginia match-up). The bracket will play out as follows (with the numbers being the seed and the CAPS signaling the projected winner):
16
8
13
12
Both
11
14 Central
10
15 Central
People expecting a shoot out between USC and
The next week will kick off…
BOWL SEASON…
which will start off by building up to the playoff games with lesser bowls. Now a loud argument against a playoff system has been that it will render the bowl system meaningless. In order to test this theory, I will now present each bowl match-up with and without a playoff and you tell me how much more meaningless the bowls become (and, just for kicks, I’ve put my picks to win in CAPS and an * next to the actual bowl game and a + next to the game that I feel would be more exciting).
NON-PLAYOFF BOWLS
Poinsettia Bowl:
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
Papa Johns.com Bowl: Southern Miss vs.
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff (and BYU will win)
This game’s about a wash in excitement level between the actual and imaginary match ups.
PURDUE vs.
Holiday Bowl:
Champs Sports Bowl:
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
TCU vs.
This match-up would change because TCU and Houston would now both be in the C-USA.
Emerald Bowl:
Meineke Car Care Bowl:
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
Alamo Bowl:
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
Armed Forces Bowl:
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
Humanitarian Bowl:
Sun Bowl: SOUTH FLORIDA vs.
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
Insight Bowl:
Chick-fil-A Bowl:
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
Outback Bowl:
Gator Bowl:
This match-up remains the same even with a playoff
International Bowl: RUTGERS vs.
GMAC Bowl:
The meaningless bowl games remain just as meaningless, with 12 of the games going unchanged and five of the changed games producing more exciting match-ups. Also, three more slots would open for bowl-eligible teams that have gotten passed on this season (
PLAYOFF BOWLS
with the idea being that the 5 BCS Bowls (plus the national championship game) and two relatively major bowls will be used to host the remaining playoff games. For this exercise, I chose to add in the Capital One Bowl and the Cotton Bowl. Both usually host marquee match-ups, and are located in markets that could handle a major bowl (Orlando and Dallas). Where each match-up is held is up to the bowls on a rotating system. For the quarter finals, the BCS Bowl (or host city, since the actual bowl doesn’t decide the championship anymore) furthest from the last time it hosted the national title game would have first choice for its game. Therefore,
Rose Bowl: 7 SOUTHERN
USC is the natural choice for the Rose Bowl and the Trojans should handle LSU in what amounts to a home game.
The next choice would go to
Fiesta Bowl: 1
Being the first year they have been involved in the national title picture,
Cotton Bowl: 4
Capital One Bowl: 11
LSU already showed what the speed of the SEC can do to the Hokies, and—like
The remaining BCS Bowls would make up the semi-finals, with the city not hosting the national title game getting first choice. Therefore,
Orange Bowl: 11
USC has the speed on defense to slow down the Gators, while also possessing enough firepower on offense to overpower the
Sugar Bowl: 1
The Sooners would be heavily favored in this game, which means that they would most likely lose, as Bob Stoops has failed on three previous occasions (’04 Sugar Bowl, ’05 Orange Bowl, and ’07 Fiesta Bowl) to win when favored. Jim Tressel, meanwhile, has proven he can be quite effective as the underdog (’03 Fiesta Bowl), which he would be again in the
National Championship Game: 1
USC is fast, but not Florida-fast, and the Trojans run a conventional offense, which the Buckeyes have proven they can stop. Beanie Wells would grind out a tough game on the ground to give






